749r Strat/Ave Pairs Thursday Morn Session March 9, 2017
Scores after 36 boards  Average:   84.0      Section  H  North-South
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C
  3   61.53  103.37  A   1                0.96(A)  Jackie Greenberg - Sheilah Wasserman
  4   58.46   98.22  A   2                0.67(A)  Geri Lovette - Connie Lovette
  8   56.76   95.36  A   3                0.48(A)  Ellen Coll - Beverly Bloss
  1   56.05   94.16  B   4     1          0.42(B)  Mimi Clarke - Verona Cormack-Thomson
 10   54.86   92.16  A   5                0.19(A)  Jim Walsh - Lynn Odland
 11   53.32   89.58  A                             Shelia Levine - Cherril Scarth
  9   49.14   82.56  B         2          0.29(B)  Bart Rhoades - Gertrude Waldman
  7   46.55   78.21  C               1    0.12(C)  Al Lindenbaum - Bruce Auld
  6   42.69   71.72  B                             Ed Talmus - Jane Grusby
  2   38.38   64.48  B                             Elaine Johnston - Margaret Smetana
  5   32.27   54.22  C                             Janet Schonbrun - Poppy Finston

749r Strat/Ave Pairs Thursday Morn Session March 9, 2017
Scores after 36 boards  Average:   84.0      Section  H  East-West
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C
 10   61.76  103.76  B   1     1          0.96(A)  Marvin Moskowitz - John Noren
  4   61.38  103.11  A   2                0.67(A)  Elizabeth Hotchkin - Phyllis Williams
  2   57.36   96.37  C   3     2     1    0.48(A)  Susan Wolfe - Susan Flora
  1   54.41   91.41  A   4                0.34(A)  Donna Toft - Jackie De Nevers
  5   49.94   83.90  C   5     3     2    0.32(B)  Sharon Call - Mari Jon DiBasilio
 11   48.98   82.29  B         4          0.22(B)  Charneth Belanger - Marilyn Sugarman
 12   48.84   82.05  B                             Johnny Pisarev - Julie Kleinbauer
  6   46.94   78.86  A                             Enid Rubin - Shirley Fiorito
  7   45.48   76.40  C                             Mike Pettergill - Ann Pettergill
  9   44.26   74.35  C                             Jan Blackford - Alison Smith
  3   42.85   71.98  B                             Dana Healy - Constance Birkie
  8   37.57   63.11  C                             Jan Mathews - Joyce Wells

Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
K 7 3 2
10 8 6 5
K 7 5
A 6
Q 10 9 4
K 9 4
Q 6
9 7 4 2
N
WE
S
A 7 2
A 10 8 4 2
Q 10 8 5 3
A J 8 6 5
Q J 3
J 9 3
K J

NS 2; EW 3; EW 1N; NS 1; EW 1; Par −100: NS 3×−1

ScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1106.360.648-Coll-Bloss vs 3-Healy-Birkie
1106.360.6411-Levine-Scarth vs 9-Blackford-Smith
504.642.3610-Walsh-Odland vs 7-Pettergill-Pettergill
1501.795.211-Clarke-Cormack-Thomson vs 1-Toft-De Nevers
1501.795.216-Talmus-Grusby vs 10-Moskowitz-Noren
1501.795.217-Lindenbaum-Auld vs 12-Pisarev-Kleinbauer
1501.795.219-Rhoades-Waldman vs 5-Call-DiBasilio

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
9 6 3
10 8
K 7 4 3
K 6 4 2
4 2
Q J 6 2
Q 10 9 5
10 8 3
N
WE
S
Q J 8
A 9 4
A 8 2
A J 9 7
A K 10 7 5
K 7 5 3
J 6
Q 5

N 2; EW 1N; E 2; E 2; S 1; EW 1; W 1; W 1; Par +100: EW 2N×−1; E 3×−1; E 3×−1

ScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2006.930.079-Rhoades-Waldman vs 5-Call-DiBasilio
1405.211.797-Lindenbaum-Auld vs 12-Pisarev-Kleinbauer
1405.211.7911-Levine-Scarth vs 9-Blackford-Smith
502.364.641-Clarke-Cormack-Thomson vs 1-Toft-De Nevers
502.364.646-Talmus-Grusby vs 10-Moskowitz-Noren
502.364.6410-Walsh-Odland vs 7-Pettergill-Pettergill
1000.076.938-Coll-Bloss vs 3-Healy-Birkie

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
8
K J 10
K 7 6 5 3
A Q 10 9
K Q 9 6 3
A 6 4
A Q 9
7 5
N
WE
S
A J 4 2
8 7 5
J 4 2
J 3 2
10 7 5
Q 9 3 2
10 8
K 8 6 4

EW 2; NS 2; NS 3; EW 1N; NS 2; Par +110

ScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2006.360.641-Clarke-Cormack-Thomson vs 1-Toft-De Nevers
2006.360.648-Coll-Bloss vs 3-Healy-Birkie
1003.503.506-Talmus-Grusby vs 10-Moskowitz-Noren
1003.503.5010-Walsh-Odland vs 7-Pettergill-Pettergill
1003.503.5011-Levine-Scarth vs 9-Blackford-Smith
1100.646.367-Lindenbaum-Auld vs 12-Pisarev-Kleinbauer
1100.646.369-Rhoades-Waldman vs 5-Call-DiBasilio

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
Q 10 7 4 2
7 5 3 2
6 2
9 7
9 6 3
Q J 10 6 4
4
10 5 4 2
N
WE
S
J 5
K 8
K J 3
A K Q 8 6 3
A K 8
A 9
A Q 10 9 8 7 5
J

NS 4; NS 4; EW 3; NS 1N; E 1; Par +500: EW 5×−2

ScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5006.930.0711-Levine-Scarth vs 8-Mathews-Wells
1305.211.791-Clarke-Cormack-Thomson vs 12-Pisarev-Kleinbauer
1305.211.798-Coll-Bloss vs 1-Toft-De Nevers
1103.503.509-Rhoades-Waldman vs 4-Hotchkin-Williams
1001.215.792-Johnston-Smetana vs 2-Wolfe-Flora
1001.215.797-Lindenbaum-Auld vs 11-Belanger-Sugarman
1001.215.7910-Walsh-Odland vs 6-Rubin-Fiorito

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
9 3
K 10 7 3
J 9 8 4
A 10 9
K Q 5 2
9 8 5
A Q 10 2
K 4
N
WE
S
A J 4
Q 6
7
J 8 7 6 5 3 2
10 8 7 6
A J 4 2
K 6 5 3
Q

EW 3; EW 1N; NS 2; EW 1; NS 1; Par −110

ScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1506.930.071-Clarke-Cormack-Thomson vs 12-Pisarev-Kleinbauer
505.211.7910-Walsh-Odland vs 6-Rubin-Fiorito
505.211.7911-Levine-Scarth vs 8-Mathews-Wells
902.934.077-Lindenbaum-Auld vs 11-Belanger-Sugarman
902.934.078-Coll-Bloss vs 1-Toft-De Nevers
1100.646.362-Johnston-Smetana vs 2-Wolfe-Flora
1100.646.369-Rhoades-Waldman vs 4-Hotchkin-Williams

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
A Q J 9 8 6 4
8 7
10 9 6 2
10 3
A 5
A Q 9 8 7 2
Q 8 5
N
WE
S
K 5
10 9 4 2
K J 6 4
K 4 3
7 2
K Q J 6 3
10 5 3
A J 7

NS 4; EW 2N; EW 3; NS 1; NS 1; Par +420

ScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2006.930.0710-Walsh-Odland vs 6-Rubin-Fiorito
1705.791.2111-Levine-Scarth vs 8-Mathews-Wells
1404.072.931-Clarke-Cormack-Thomson vs 12-Pisarev-Kleinbauer
1404.072.939-Rhoades-Waldman vs 4-Hotchkin-Williams
1002.364.648-Coll-Bloss vs 1-Toft-De Nevers
501.215.792-Johnston-Smetana vs 2-Wolfe-Flora
1000.076.937-Lindenbaum-Auld vs 11-Belanger-Sugarman

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
K
6 2
8 6 3 2
A K Q 10 8 2
J 9 3
A K J 9
J 9 7
J 7 3
N
WE
S
A 10 8 7 5
10 5 4 3
Q 4
5 4
Q 6 4 2
Q 8 7
A K 10 5
9 6

NS 2N; NS 3; NS 3; EW 1; EW 1; Par +120

ScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6006.930.073-Greenberg-Wasserman vs 3-Healy-Birkie
1305.791.218-Coll-Bloss vs 12-Pisarev-Kleinbauer
1204.642.362-Johnston-Smetana vs 1-Toft-De Nevers
1102.364.649-Rhoades-Waldman vs 2-Wolfe-Flora
1102.364.6410-Walsh-Odland vs 5-Call-DiBasilio
1102.364.6411-Levine-Scarth vs 7-Pettergill-Pettergill
1000.076.931-Clarke-Cormack-Thomson vs 11-Belanger-Sugarman

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
5 3 2
6 5
K 9
A Q 10 9 5 3
7 4
Q 10 7
A J 7 4 3 2
7 6
N
WE
S
K 10 9
K J 3
Q 8 6
K J 4 2
A Q J 8 6
A 9 8 4 2
10 5
8

NS 5; NS 4; NS 2N; NS 3; EW 1; Par +450

ScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2006.930.071-Clarke-Cormack-Thomson vs 11-Belanger-Sugarman
1705.211.798-Coll-Bloss vs 12-Pisarev-Kleinbauer
1705.211.799-Rhoades-Waldman vs 2-Wolfe-Flora
1503.503.503-Greenberg-Wasserman vs 3-Healy-Birkie
1401.795.2110-Walsh-Odland vs 5-Call-DiBasilio
1401.795.2111-Levine-Scarth vs 7-Pettergill-Pettergill
500.076.932-Johnston-Smetana vs 1-Toft-De Nevers

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
Q 6 2
A K J 4
K 6
K 9 4 3
3
Q 10 9 6 3
A Q 7
J 10 8 7
N
WE
S
K J 10 4
7 2
9 4 3 2
A 6 2
A 9 8 7 5
8 5
J 10 8 5
Q 5

NS 3; S 2N; N 1N; NS 1; NS 1; NS 1; Par +140

ScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1405.791.211-Clarke-Cormack-Thomson vs 11-Belanger-Sugarman
1405.791.213-Greenberg-Wasserman vs 3-Healy-Birkie
1405.791.2110-Walsh-Odland vs 5-Call-DiBasilio
1102.934.072-Johnston-Smetana vs 1-Toft-De Nevers
1102.934.0711-Levine-Scarth vs 7-Pettergill-Pettergill
901.215.799-Rhoades-Waldman vs 2-Wolfe-Flora
1000.076.938-Coll-Bloss vs 12-Pisarev-Kleinbauer

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
A K
K Q 10
Q J 3
K J 10 7 4
9 5 4 3 2
6 4 3
A 10 6 5 2
N
WE
S
J 10 6
9 7 2
9 4
A 9 8 5 2
Q 8 7
A J 8 5
K 8 7
Q 6 3

NS 5N; S 5; N 4; NS 4; S 2; NS 3; N 1; Par +660

ScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6606.360.6410-Walsh-Odland vs 3-Healy-Birkie
6606.360.6411-Levine-Scarth vs 6-Rubin-Fiorito
6304.072.931-Clarke-Cormack-Thomson vs 10-Moskowitz-Noren
6304.072.932-Johnston-Smetana vs 12-Pisarev-Kleinbauer
1302.364.644-Lovette-Lovette vs 4-Hotchkin-Williams
1000.646.363-Greenberg-Wasserman vs 2-Wolfe-Flora
1000.646.369-Rhoades-Waldman vs 1-Toft-De Nevers

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
A 5 3
A J 6 3
K J 10 4 2
7
K J 4
K 10 8 7 5 4
A 9
10 4
N
WE
S
Q 10 9 8 6
2
Q 7 6
K J 6 5
7 2
Q 9
8 5 3
A Q 9 8 3 2

EW 2; NS 3; NS 1N; NS 2; S 1; Par +100: EW 3×−1

ScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W 
8006.930.074-Lovette-Lovette vs 4-Hotchkin-Williams
1504.642.361-Clarke-Cormack-Thomson vs 10-Moskowitz-Noren
1504.642.363-Greenberg-Wasserman vs 2-Wolfe-Flora
1504.642.3611-Levine-Scarth vs 6-Rubin-Fiorito
1001.795.212-Johnston-Smetana vs 12-Pisarev-Kleinbauer
1001.795.2110-Walsh-Odland vs 3-Healy-Birkie
500.076.939-Rhoades-Waldman vs 1-Toft-De Nevers

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
A Q J
K 8 6
A 9 8
K Q 10 4
K 9
A 9 4
J 10 5 2
8 5 3 2
N
WE
S
8 7 5 2
Q 7 2
K 7 4
J 9 7
10 6 4 3
J 10 5 3
Q 6 3
A 6

N 5N; N 5; S 4N; S 4; NS 4; NS 4; NS 3; Par +660

ScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6606.930.072-Johnston-Smetana vs 12-Pisarev-Kleinbauer
6505.791.2110-Walsh-Odland vs 3-Healy-Birkie
6304.072.934-Lovette-Lovette vs 4-Hotchkin-Williams
6304.072.939-Rhoades-Waldman vs 1-Toft-De Nevers
6002.364.643-Greenberg-Wasserman vs 2-Wolfe-Flora
2101.215.7911-Levine-Scarth vs 6-Rubin-Fiorito
1800.076.931-Clarke-Cormack-Thomson vs 10-Moskowitz-Noren

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
A 2
K 9 7 6
9 5
Q J 10 7 6
K Q
A J 10 4 2
A K 10 8 4
4
N
WE
S
J 8 6 4 3
Q 5 3
J 6
A 8 3
10 9 7 5
8
Q 7 3 2
K 9 5 2

EW 5; EW 3; EW 4; EW 2N; S 2; N 1; Par −650

ScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2006.930.073-Greenberg-Wasserman vs 1-Toft-De Nevers
1005.211.792-Johnston-Smetana vs 11-Belanger-Sugarman
1005.211.7911-Levine-Scarth vs 4-Hotchkin-Williams
2003.503.505-Schonbrun-Finston vs 5-Call-DiBasilio
6201.795.211-Clarke-Cormack-Thomson vs 9-Blackford-Smith
6201.795.2110-Walsh-Odland vs 2-Wolfe-Flora
6500.076.934-Lovette-Lovette vs 3-Healy-Birkie

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
K J 10 3 2
A 9 2
A 10 9 6 5
9 7
K J 8 7 6 3
Q 4
Q 7 3
N
WE
S
A Q 6 4
A 10 5 2
K 7 6 5
2
8 5
Q 9 4
J 10 8 3
K J 8 4

EW 5; NS 3; EW 1N; NS 1; W 1; Par −450

ScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W 
506.930.072-Johnston-Smetana vs 11-Belanger-Sugarman
1405.791.215-Schonbrun-Finston vs 5-Call-DiBasilio
2004.072.931-Clarke-Cormack-Thomson vs 9-Blackford-Smith
2004.072.9310-Walsh-Odland vs 2-Wolfe-Flora
3002.364.643-Greenberg-Wasserman vs 1-Toft-De Nevers
4201.215.794-Lovette-Lovette vs 3-Healy-Birkie
4500.076.9311-Levine-Scarth vs 4-Hotchkin-Williams

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
A 10 4 3
K 6
A Q 8 5
6 4 2
Q 6 5
Q 9 7
K 9 4 2
K 10 3
N
WE
S
J 9 2
10 5 4 3 2
7 3
8 7 5
K 8 7
A J 8
J 10 6
A Q J 9

NS 6; NS 5N; NS 5; NS 5; NS 3; Par +1370

ScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6905.791.213-Greenberg-Wasserman vs 1-Toft-De Nevers
6905.791.214-Lovette-Lovette vs 3-Healy-Birkie
6905.791.2110-Walsh-Odland vs 2-Wolfe-Flora
6602.364.641-Clarke-Cormack-Thomson vs 9-Blackford-Smith
6602.364.642-Johnston-Smetana vs 11-Belanger-Sugarman
6602.364.6411-Levine-Scarth vs 4-Hotchkin-Williams
1000.076.935-Schonbrun-Finston vs 5-Call-DiBasilio

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
8 5 4
K 10 8 2
A K 10
10 7 3
K
9 7 6 3
Q 9 5 2
Q J 6 2
N
WE
S
Q 9 6 3
A 5 4
J 6 3
K 9 8
A J 10 7 2
Q J
8 7 4
A 5 4

NS 3; NS 2N; NS 1; NS 1; NS 1; Par +140

ScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1406.930.071-Clarke-Cormack-Thomson vs 8-Mathews-Wells
1105.791.2111-Levine-Scarth vs 3-Healy-Birkie
504.642.364-Lovette-Lovette vs 2-Wolfe-Flora
903.503.506-Talmus-Grusby vs 6-Rubin-Fiorito
1001.215.792-Johnston-Smetana vs 10-Moskowitz-Noren
1001.215.793-Greenberg-Wasserman vs 12-Pisarev-Kleinbauer
1001.215.795-Schonbrun-Finston vs 4-Hotchkin-Williams

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
J 9 6 5
8 6 3
A 5
A K J 3
K 7 3
5
K Q J 10 6
9 7 5 4
N
WE
S
4 2
A K Q J 9
9 7 2
Q 6 2
A Q 10 8
10 7 4 2
8 4 3
10 8

NS 2; EW 2; EW 1N; EW 2; EW 2; Par +100: EW 2N×−1; EW 3×−1; EW 3×−1; EW 3×−1

ScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1406.930.0711-Levine-Scarth vs 3-Healy-Birkie
505.791.213-Greenberg-Wasserman vs 12-Pisarev-Kleinbauer
504.072.934-Lovette-Lovette vs 2-Wolfe-Flora
504.072.936-Talmus-Grusby vs 6-Rubin-Fiorito
1102.364.645-Schonbrun-Finston vs 4-Hotchkin-Williams
1201.215.791-Clarke-Cormack-Thomson vs 8-Mathews-Wells
1400.076.932-Johnston-Smetana vs 10-Moskowitz-Noren

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
J 9 2
7 6
K Q 5 2
9 8 6 4
10 3
A 9 5 4
A 10 7 6 3
10 5
N
WE
S
A 7 6
K Q J 10 3
J 4
A K J
K Q 8 5 4
8 2
9 8
Q 7 3 2

EW 5; EW 3N; EW 4; EW 1; E 1; Par −450

ScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1506.930.071-Clarke-Cormack-Thomson vs 8-Mathews-Wells
4503.503.503-Greenberg-Wasserman vs 12-Pisarev-Kleinbauer
4503.503.504-Lovette-Lovette vs 2-Wolfe-Flora
4503.503.505-Schonbrun-Finston vs 4-Hotchkin-Williams
4503.503.506-Talmus-Grusby vs 6-Rubin-Fiorito
4503.503.5011-Levine-Scarth vs 3-Healy-Birkie
9800.076.932-Johnston-Smetana vs 10-Moskowitz-Noren

Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
A 8 5
A 2
J 4 2
8 7 6 3 2
K Q J 10 3 2
9 4
K Q 10 8 5
N
WE
S
9
3
A 7 6 3
A K Q J 10 5 4
7 6 4
K Q J 10 8 7 6 5
9
9

EW 4; EW 5; EW 5; NS 3; Par −300: NS 5×−2

ScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2006.930.076-Talmus-Grusby vs 5-Call-DiBasilio
1005.791.214-Lovette-Lovette vs 1-Toft-De Nevers
1204.642.363-Greenberg-Wasserman vs 11-Belanger-Sugarman
3003.503.501-Clarke-Cormack-Thomson vs 6-Rubin-Fiorito
6002.364.647-Lindenbaum-Auld vs 7-Pettergill-Pettergill
6200.646.362-Johnston-Smetana vs 9-Blackford-Smith
6200.646.365-Schonbrun-Finston vs 3-Healy-Birkie

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
A Q 10 9
A Q J 8 5 3
J 8 5
8
10 9 7 6 2
Q 6 4
J 4 3 2
N
WE
S
4 3 2
A 10 9 7 2
A Q 9 6 5
K J 7 6 5
K 4
K 3
K 10 8 7

N 6; S 5; N 5; NS 4N; S 4; EW 3; EW 1; Par +1100: EW 7×−4

ScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6806.360.643-Greenberg-Wasserman vs 11-Belanger-Sugarman
6806.360.644-Lovette-Lovette vs 1-Toft-De Nevers
6504.072.935-Schonbrun-Finston vs 3-Healy-Birkie
6504.072.936-Talmus-Grusby vs 5-Call-DiBasilio
6201.795.211-Clarke-Cormack-Thomson vs 6-Rubin-Fiorito
6201.795.212-Johnston-Smetana vs 9-Blackford-Smith
3000.076.937-Lindenbaum-Auld vs 7-Pettergill-Pettergill

Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul
4
K Q J 5 3
Q 4 2
Q 10 3 2
A K Q 9 5 2
7 6 4
A
A 9 4
N
WE
S
J 8 7
10 8 2
7 6 3
J 8 6 5
10 6 3
A 9
K J 10 9 8 5
K 7

NS 3; NS 4; EW 2N; EW 2; NS 1; Par +130

ScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W 
7906.930.074-Lovette-Lovette vs 1-Toft-De Nevers
1705.791.211-Clarke-Cormack-Thomson vs 6-Rubin-Fiorito
1504.642.367-Lindenbaum-Auld vs 7-Pettergill-Pettergill
1302.934.073-Greenberg-Wasserman vs 11-Belanger-Sugarman
1302.934.076-Talmus-Grusby vs 5-Call-DiBasilio
501.215.792-Johnston-Smetana vs 9-Blackford-Smith
1100.076.935-Schonbrun-Finston vs 3-Healy-Birkie

Board 22
East Deals
E-W Vul
A 7 4 2
Q 6 5 4
J 9 4 2
2
Q 10 5
9 8 3
A Q 10 3
A 8 6
N
WE
S
J 9 8
K 7
8 7 5
K J 10 9 4
K 6 3
A J 10 2
K 6
Q 7 5 3

NS 3; NS 2; NS 1N; EW 1; Par +140

ScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1406.500.503-Greenberg-Wasserman vs 10-Moskowitz-Noren
1406.500.507-Lindenbaum-Auld vs 6-Rubin-Fiorito
1104.502.502-Johnston-Smetana vs 7-Pettergill-Pettergill
1104.502.508-Coll-Bloss vs 8-Mathews-Wells
502.504.501-Clarke-Cormack-Thomson vs 5-Call-DiBasilio
502.504.504-Lovette-Lovette vs 12-Pisarev-Kleinbauer
1000.506.505-Schonbrun-Finston vs 2-Wolfe-Flora
1000.506.506-Talmus-Grusby vs 4-Hotchkin-Williams

Board 23
South Deals
Both Vul
10 9 4 3
6 2
K Q 8 7
Q 9 6
A 8 2
Q J 10 5 3
J 10 2
10 3
N
WE
S
Q 7 5
A 9 7 4
9 5
K J 7 2
K J 6
K 8
A 6 4 3
A 8 5 4

N 4; S 3; NS 4; NS 2N; NS 3; EW 1; Par +620

ScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1307.000.001-Clarke-Cormack-Thomson vs 5-Call-DiBasilio
1205.002.002-Johnston-Smetana vs 7-Pettergill-Pettergill
1205.002.003-Greenberg-Wasserman vs 10-Moskowitz-Noren
1205.002.008-Coll-Bloss vs 8-Mathews-Wells
902.504.504-Lovette-Lovette vs 12-Pisarev-Kleinbauer
902.504.506-Talmus-Grusby vs 4-Hotchkin-Williams
1001.006.005-Schonbrun-Finston vs 2-Wolfe-Flora
2000.007.007-Lindenbaum-Auld vs 6-Rubin-Fiorito

Board 24
West Deals
None Vul
J 7 4 2
6 5 3 2
5
K 9 7 2
Q 6
K J
A K Q 9 8 4
J 6 4
N
WE
S
A K 10 5
A 10 9 7 4
7 6
8 3
9 8 3
Q 8
J 10 3 2
A Q 10 5

EW 5; EW 4; EW 3N; EW 4; EW 2; Par −450

ScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1507.000.003-Greenberg-Wasserman vs 10-Moskowitz-Noren
504.502.504-Lovette-Lovette vs 12-Pisarev-Kleinbauer
504.502.505-Schonbrun-Finston vs 2-Wolfe-Flora
504.502.507-Lindenbaum-Auld vs 6-Rubin-Fiorito
504.502.508-Coll-Bloss vs 8-Mathews-Wells
4002.005.001-Clarke-Cormack-Thomson vs 5-Call-DiBasilio
4500.506.502-Johnston-Smetana vs 7-Pettergill-Pettergill
4500.506.506-Talmus-Grusby vs 4-Hotchkin-Williams

Board 25
North Deals
E-W Vul
J 10 7 3
A 8 6 4
A Q 9
5 4
8 5 4 2
K 3 2
10 8 6
9 3 2
N
WE
S
K Q
Q J 10
K 3 2
K Q J 8 6
A 9 6
9 7 5
J 7 5 4
A 10 7

NS 2; NS 2; NS 1; EW 1; Par +110

ScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1005.501.502-Johnston-Smetana vs 6-Rubin-Fiorito
1005.501.503-Greenberg-Wasserman vs 8-Mathews-Wells
1005.501.508-Coll-Bloss vs 7-Pettergill-Pettergill
1005.501.509-Rhoades-Waldman vs 9-Blackford-Smith
903.004.007-Lindenbaum-Auld vs 5-Call-DiBasilio
901.006.004-Lovette-Lovette vs 11-Belanger-Sugarman
901.006.005-Schonbrun-Finston vs 1-Toft-De Nevers
901.006.006-Talmus-Grusby vs 3-Healy-Birkie

Board 26
East Deals
Both Vul
K 7
9 7 6 3
A 10 3
J 10 9 7
J 10 9 8 3 2
K J 9 6
Q 8 4
N
WE
S
Q 4
Q 10 8 5 4
8 7 4
K 5 2
A 6 5
A K J 2
Q 5 2
A 6 3

NS 3; NS 4; NS 2N; NS 2; S 1; Par +140

ScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1406.500.506-Talmus-Grusby vs 3-Healy-Birkie
1406.500.508-Coll-Bloss vs 7-Pettergill-Pettergill
1205.002.003-Greenberg-Wasserman vs 8-Mathews-Wells
1003.004.005-Schonbrun-Finston vs 1-Toft-De Nevers
1003.004.007-Lindenbaum-Auld vs 5-Call-DiBasilio
1003.004.009-Rhoades-Waldman vs 9-Blackford-Smith
2000.506.502-Johnston-Smetana vs 6-Rubin-Fiorito
2000.506.504-Lovette-Lovette vs 11-Belanger-Sugarman

Board 27
South Deals
None Vul
8 7 5
A Q 8 7
J 10 4
10 9 6
A J 3
6 5 3 2
6 5 2
K 7 3
N
WE
S
10 9 6 2
10 9
Q 8 7 3
A 5 2
K Q 4
K J 4
A K 9
Q J 8 4

S 3N; NS 3; N 2N; NS 3; NS 2; NS 1; Par +400

ScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4307.000.008-Coll-Bloss vs 7-Pettergill-Pettergill
4005.501.502-Johnston-Smetana vs 6-Rubin-Fiorito
4005.501.504-Lovette-Lovette vs 11-Belanger-Sugarman
1503.503.506-Talmus-Grusby vs 3-Healy-Birkie
1503.503.509-Rhoades-Waldman vs 9-Blackford-Smith
501.006.003-Greenberg-Wasserman vs 8-Mathews-Wells
501.006.005-Schonbrun-Finston vs 1-Toft-De Nevers
501.006.007-Lindenbaum-Auld vs 5-Call-DiBasilio

Board 28
West Deals
N-S Vul
A 7 5
A Q J
10 8 2
A 10 9 5
2
K 8 4 3
Q J 9 7 6 4
J 4
N
WE
S
Q 9 8 6 3
6 5
K 5
8 7 3 2
K J 10 4
10 9 7 2
A 3
K Q 6

NS 6N; NS 6; NS 6; NS 5; NS 2; Par +1440

ScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W 
7207.000.003-Greenberg-Wasserman vs 7-Pettergill-Pettergill
6906.001.004-Lovette-Lovette vs 9-Blackford-Smith
6805.002.007-Lindenbaum-Auld vs 4-Hotchkin-Williams
6603.503.508-Coll-Bloss vs 6-Rubin-Fiorito
6603.503.5010-Walsh-Odland vs 10-Moskowitz-Noren
6002.005.005-Schonbrun-Finston vs 12-Pisarev-Kleinbauer
1401.006.009-Rhoades-Waldman vs 8-Mathews-Wells
1000.007.006-Talmus-Grusby vs 2-Wolfe-Flora

Board 29
North Deals
Both Vul
K Q J 9 4 2
6 5 4
10 9 4
3
5 3
A K 9 3
A K J 7
8 6 4
N
WE
S
10 7
7
Q 8 6 5 3 2
A K Q J
A 8 6
Q J 10 8 2
10 9 7 5 2

EW 5; NS 2; E 3; EW 1N; W 2; NS 1; Par −600

ScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2007.000.009-Rhoades-Waldman vs 8-Mathews-Wells
1005.501.504-Lovette-Lovette vs 9-Blackford-Smith
1005.501.505-Schonbrun-Finston vs 12-Pisarev-Kleinbauer
1503.004.006-Talmus-Grusby vs 2-Wolfe-Flora
1503.004.007-Lindenbaum-Auld vs 4-Hotchkin-Williams
1503.004.008-Coll-Bloss vs 6-Rubin-Fiorito
6000.506.503-Greenberg-Wasserman vs 7-Pettergill-Pettergill
6000.506.5010-Walsh-Odland vs 10-Moskowitz-Noren

Board 30
East Deals
None Vul
10 8 3
9 7 6 3
J 9 7 3 2
6
J 9 2
K 8
A K 10 8
10 7 3 2
N
WE
S
A Q 7 5
A Q J 10 5
Q 6
J 8
K 6 4
4 2
5 4
A K Q 9 5 4

E 4N; EW 4; EW 4; W 3N; EW 2; EW 2; Par −430

ScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W 
507.000.004-Lovette-Lovette vs 9-Blackford-Smith
1706.001.0010-Walsh-Odland vs 10-Moskowitz-Noren
1805.002.009-Rhoades-Waldman vs 8-Mathews-Wells
4202.504.503-Greenberg-Wasserman vs 7-Pettergill-Pettergill
4202.504.506-Talmus-Grusby vs 2-Wolfe-Flora
4202.504.507-Lindenbaum-Auld vs 4-Hotchkin-Williams
4202.504.508-Coll-Bloss vs 6-Rubin-Fiorito
4300.007.005-Schonbrun-Finston vs 12-Pisarev-Kleinbauer

Board 31
South Deals
N-S Vul
A 9 7 4
A 10 9
A K 6 5
K 4
5 3 2
J 7
J 10 8 3
J 9 7 6
N
WE
S
Q J 8
K Q 5 4 2
7 2
Q 10 8
K 10 6
8 6 3
Q 9 4
A 5 3 2

NS 4; NS 3N; NS 3; NS 4; NS 2; Par +620

ScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6606.500.508-Coll-Bloss vs 5-Call-DiBasilio
6606.500.509-Rhoades-Waldman vs 7-Pettergill-Pettergill
6304.502.5010-Walsh-Odland vs 9-Blackford-Smith
6304.502.5011-Levine-Scarth vs 11-Belanger-Sugarman
6002.504.506-Talmus-Grusby vs 1-Toft-De Nevers
6002.504.507-Lindenbaum-Auld vs 3-Healy-Birkie
1801.006.004-Lovette-Lovette vs 8-Mathews-Wells
1200.007.005-Schonbrun-Finston vs 10-Moskowitz-Noren

Board 32
West Deals
E-W Vul
7 5 2
A K 9 8 7
Q 3
A 5 3
Q J 8 6 3
5 4
A 8 2
Q J 9
N
WE
S
10 9
Q J 3
J 6 5 4
10 8 6 2
A K 4
10 6 2
K 10 9 7
K 7 4

NS 4N; NS 4; NS 3; NS 3; NS 2; Par +430

ScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4507.000.004-Lovette-Lovette vs 8-Mathews-Wells
4306.001.0010-Walsh-Odland vs 9-Blackford-Smith
4204.502.507-Lindenbaum-Auld vs 3-Healy-Birkie
4204.502.509-Rhoades-Waldman vs 7-Pettergill-Pettergill
1403.004.0011-Levine-Scarth vs 11-Belanger-Sugarman
1202.005.005-Schonbrun-Finston vs 10-Moskowitz-Noren
500.506.506-Talmus-Grusby vs 1-Toft-De Nevers
500.506.508-Coll-Bloss vs 5-Call-DiBasilio

Board 33
North Deals
None Vul
Q J 10
J 4
J 6 5 4 2
K 4 2
7 5 4 2
Q 10 9 8 6 5 2
10 3
N
WE
S
A 9 8 3
A
A K Q 7
J 9 7 6
K 6
K 7 3
9 8
A Q 10 8 5 3

EW 5; EW 4; N 2N; NS 3; S 1N; EW 1; Par −450

ScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2007.000.007-Lindenbaum-Auld vs 3-Healy-Birkie
1005.501.508-Coll-Bloss vs 5-Call-DiBasilio
1005.501.509-Rhoades-Waldman vs 7-Pettergill-Pettergill
503.503.504-Lovette-Lovette vs 8-Mathews-Wells
503.503.5010-Walsh-Odland vs 9-Blackford-Smith
902.005.005-Schonbrun-Finston vs 10-Moskowitz-Noren
1501.006.006-Talmus-Grusby vs 1-Toft-De Nevers
1700.007.0011-Levine-Scarth vs 11-Belanger-Sugarman

Board 34
East Deals
N-S Vul
K 8
5 3
Q 9 8 7 5 2
Q 4 2
J 10 6
K 7 6
A J 6
10 7 6 5
N
WE
S
Q 9 7
J 10 9 8 2
4
A K J 3
A 5 4 3 2
A Q 4
K 10 3
9 8

EW 3; NS 3; EW 3; NS 1; Par −140

ScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1006.930.077-Lindenbaum-Auld vs 2-Wolfe-Flora
1105.791.216-Talmus-Grusby vs 11-Belanger-Sugarman
1404.072.938-Coll-Bloss vs 4-Hotchkin-Williams
1404.072.9310-Walsh-Odland vs 8-Mathews-Wells
1701.795.215-Schonbrun-Finston vs 9-Blackford-Smith
1701.795.219-Rhoades-Waldman vs 6-Rubin-Fiorito
2000.076.9311-Levine-Scarth vs 10-Moskowitz-Noren

Board 35
South Deals
E-W Vul
K 9 8 7
Q J 9 5
K 9 8 5
K
Q 2
A 10 8 6 4
7 2
A 10 7 3
N
WE
S
A 5 4
7
Q J 6 4 3
Q J 9 6
J 10 6 3
K 3 2
A 10
8 5 4 2

NS 2; EW 3; EW 2; Par −100: NS 3×−1

ScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1406.930.077-Lindenbaum-Auld vs 2-Wolfe-Flora
1105.791.215-Schonbrun-Finston vs 9-Blackford-Smith
1004.642.366-Talmus-Grusby vs 11-Belanger-Sugarman
903.503.5010-Walsh-Odland vs 8-Mathews-Wells
802.364.648-Coll-Bloss vs 4-Hotchkin-Williams
501.215.799-Rhoades-Waldman vs 6-Rubin-Fiorito
6000.076.9311-Levine-Scarth vs 10-Moskowitz-Noren

Board 36
West Deals
Both Vul
K 9 8
Q 10
A Q 10 9 5
J 9 3
7 5 4
J 6 5
8 7 4
A K 7 6
N
WE
S
A J 10 6 3 2
4 3
J 3
8 5 4
Q
A K 9 8 7 2
K 6 2
Q 10 2

NS 4N; NS 4; NS 4; NS 2; EW 1; Par +630

ScoresMatchpointsPairs
N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6806.930.079-Rhoades-Waldman vs 6-Rubin-Fiorito
6605.791.2111-Levine-Scarth vs 10-Moskowitz-Noren
6504.642.366-Talmus-Grusby vs 11-Belanger-Sugarman
6202.934.075-Schonbrun-Finston vs 9-Blackford-Smith
6202.934.077-Lindenbaum-Auld vs 2-Wolfe-Flora
2001.215.7910-Walsh-Odland vs 8-Mathews-Wells
1700.076.938-Coll-Bloss vs 4-Hotchkin-Williams